B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) utilitarianism.
B) rule-utilitarianism.
C) ethical egoism.
D) divine command theory.
F) C) and D)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) cultural egoism.
B) emotivism.
C) subjective relativism.
D) social relativism.
F) C) and D)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) is approved of by one's culture.
B) maximizes reflective equilibrium.
C) conforms to deontological rules.
D) maximizes overall happiness, everyone considered.
F) A) and C)
Correct Answer
verified
D
Correct Answer
verified
A) overall utility.
B) our considered moral judgments.
C) our self-interest.
D) our sense of maximum utility.
F) A) and C)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Moral theories are evaluated based on se...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
View Answer
A) moral
B) nonmoral
C) religious
D) relativistic
F) C) and D)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The central difference between utilitari...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
View Answer
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The best way to identify implicit premis...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
View Answer
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) consistent.
B) right.
C) fallible.
D) understood.
F) C) and D)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Traditional utilitarianism is a moral th...View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
View Answer
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
The basic structure of a moral argument typically consists of a set of premises that lead to a conclusion, where the premises include at least one moral principle and one or more factual claims. The purpose of a moral argument is to justify a particular moral stance by showing that it follows logically from the accepted moral principles and relevant facts. Here is a breakdown of the components:
1. **Moral Principle (Normative Premise):** This is a general statement about what is right or wrong, good or bad, just or unjust. It expresses a value judgment or a normative standard that should be adhered to. For example, "It is wrong to cause unnecessary harm to sentient beings."
2. **Factual Claim (Descriptive Premise):** This is a statement about the world that can be true or false and is verifiable by observation, experience, or scientific evidence. For example, "Factory farming causes unnecessary harm to animals."
3. **Conclusion (Moral Judgment):** This is the moral position or action that is being argued for. It is derived from the combination of the moral principle and the factual claim. For example, "Therefore, factory farming is wrong."
Here is how a moral argument might be structured using these components:
- **Premise 1 (Moral Principle):** All individuals have a right to personal autonomy.
- **Premise 2 (Factual Claim):** Mandatory curfews infringe upon individuals' personal autonomy.
- **Conclusion (Moral Judgment):** Therefore, mandatory curfews are morally wrong.
The strength of a moral argument depends on the acceptability of the moral principle, the accuracy of the factual claim, and the logical coherence of the argument. If any of these components are weak or contested, the argument may be challenged or refuted. It is also important to note that moral arguments can be complex and may involve multiple premises and sub-arguments, especially when dealing with intricate ethical issues.
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
B) False
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
Subjective relativism and social relativism both have problematic implications that can impact individuals and society as a whole.
One of the main issues with subjective relativism is that it can lead to moral and ethical confusion. If each individual is allowed to determine their own truth and morality based on their personal beliefs and feelings, it can create a situation where there is no universal standard for right and wrong. This can lead to moral relativism, where any action can be justified based on individual perspectives, which can be harmful to society as a whole.
Social relativism, on the other hand, can lead to cultural relativism, where the values and norms of a particular society are considered to be the ultimate standard for judging the behavior of its members. This can lead to the justification of harmful practices such as discrimination, oppression, and human rights abuses under the guise of cultural tolerance and acceptance.
Both subjective and social relativism can also lead to a lack of accountability and responsibility. If individuals and societies are not held to a universal standard of truth and morality, it can be difficult to hold them accountable for their actions. This can lead to a breakdown of trust and cooperation within society, as well as a lack of progress and development.
In conclusion, subjective and social relativism can have problematic implications such as moral confusion, cultural justification of harmful practices, and a lack of accountability. It is important to recognize and address these implications in order to promote a more just and ethical society.
Correct Answer
Answered by ExamLex AI
A) objective moral values.
B) good or bad actions
C) subjective moral principles.
D) moral rules.
F) A) and D)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) conflicts.
B) problems.
C) dilemmas.
D) disputes.
F) None of the above
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
A) internal consistency
B) consistency with society's rules
C) consistency with our innermost feelings
D) consistency with the opinions of others
F) A) and D)
Correct Answer
verified
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 1 - 20 of 50
Related Exams